Part Two: Missed Opportunities, the Great Enshitification, the Consequences for the Young, and the Age of Flux
The
Missed Moment
The end of
the Cold War in 1989 was supposed to open a new chapter. With the fall of the
Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union, Americans were told that
history itself had ended—that liberal democracy and free markets had triumphed
once and for all. For a brief moment, it seemed as if the United States might
redirect the vast resources once devoted to military competition into a “peace
dividend”: rebuilding infrastructure, expanding education, addressing poverty,
and perhaps even taking early action on the environment.
That moment
never came.
Instead, the
1990s became a decade of missed opportunities. The neoliberal consensus, now
bipartisan, turned away from social investment and doubled down on
globalization, deregulation, and the technological boom. Bill Clinton, elected
on the promise of a new kind of Democrat, embraced free trade, loosened
financial rules, and celebrated the market as the engine of progress. For
ordinary Americans, the message was clear: government would no longer guarantee
security or prosperity—it was up to the individual to adapt, hustle, and
compete.
Meanwhile,
the scientific evidence on climate change was already mounting. By 1988, NASA’s
James Hansen had testified before Congress that global warming was underway.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established the same
year. The link between fossil fuel combustion and rising greenhouse gases was
no longer speculative; it was measurable, observable, and widely understood
among scientists. Yet the political will to act never materialized. The United
States signed but never ratified the Kyoto Protocol. Fossil fuel interests,
well-funded and politically connected, sowed doubt and confusion, successfully
delaying action at the very moment when intervention could have altered the
trajectory.
Culturally,
too, the 1990s revealed a shift. The decade was suffused with optimism about
the digital future—Silicon Valley promised a frictionless world of connection
and innovation. But beneath the hype, the social fabric was fraying. The
dot-com bubble inflated a speculative economy, while traditional industries
continued to wither. Communities built on manufacturing hollowed out, replaced
by service jobs that paid less and offered fewer protections. For many young
people entering adulthood, the promise of upward mobility felt increasingly
fragile.
The missed
moment was not only about economics or climate—it was about governance itself.
The flaws in America’s political system became harder to ignore. The Electoral
College allowed a president to lose the popular vote and still win the White
House. Senate representation gave disproportionate power to smaller, rural
states. And campaign finance—already awash in corporate influence—tightened its
grip. Ordinary citizens, seeing their voices diluted, began to disengage,
deepening a cycle of political alienation.
Then there
was the violence. School shootings, once unthinkable, became part of the
national landscape. Columbine in 1999 shocked the country, but instead of
catalyzing meaningful reform, it became the grim template for a recurring
nightmare. Sandy Hook would follow in 2012, and countless other tragedies in
between. Each time, the response was paralysis—thoughts and prayers instead of
legislation. The inability to address such a glaring public safety crisis
revealed a government increasingly incapable of acting on behalf of its
citizens, even in the face of horror.
Looking
back, the 1990s and early 2000s were a hinge point. The United States had the
wealth, the technology, and the global standing to redirect its trajectory—to
build a more sustainable economy, strengthen its social fabric, and restore
faith in democratic governance. Instead, the opportunity slipped away. Growth
was celebrated, but inequality widened. Climate warnings were heard but
ignored. Governance flaws were visible, but unaddressed.
This was the
missed moment: the chance to pivot from acceleration to sustainability, from
neoliberalism to renewal. Instead, America doubled down on a system already
beginning to show signs of strain. The consequences of that inaction would not
be felt immediately, but when they arrived, they would fall hardest on the
generations who had no say in squandering the opportunity.
The Great
Enshitification
The internet
was once hailed as humanity’s new frontier, a digital commons where knowledge
would flow freely and barriers of geography, class, and gatekeeping would fall
away. In the 1990s and early 2000s, there was a real sense of possibility:
search engines that promised to catalog the world’s information, forums that
connected strangers across continents, platforms that allowed anyone with a
modem to publish, share, and participate. For a generation, this was
intoxicating—the promise of democracy reborn in the ether of cyberspace.
But what
began as liberation has hardened into enclosure. The open, decentralized
internet has steadily given way to walled gardens controlled by a handful of
corporations whose business model depends not on empowerment, but on capture.
This transformation, which writer Cory Doctorow has memorably dubbed
“enshitification,” follows a familiar trajectory: platforms start out good to
lure users, then become exploitative to serve advertisers, and finally degrade
outright as monopolies extract value from everyone—users, workers,
creators—until little remains but a hollowed-out husk.
Social media
embodies this descent most clearly. What began as a way to connect with friends
or share updates became, by the 2010s, a system optimized to keep eyes glued to
screens. Algorithms were tuned not for truth, not for depth, but for
engagement—which often meant outrage, misinformation, or spectacle. Advertising
dollars rewarded the most inflammatory content, while meaningful discourse was
buried. For creators, the platforms promised visibility but delivered
precarity: one tweak of the algorithm, and entire livelihoods vanished.
E-commerce
followed a similar path. Amazon, once lauded for its convenience and selection,
consolidated power through predatory pricing, relentless surveillance of
sellers, and exploitative labor practices. Independent businesses were
absorbed, crushed, or made dependent on a platform that could change the rules
at will. Consumers enjoyed convenience, but at the cost of diminished choice,
lower quality, and a system where the profits accrued not to communities but to
a centralized behemoth.
Even the
search engines that once seemed like the great liberators have been corroded.
Where once search results offered pathways into the web’s vast archives, they
now increasingly prioritize paid placements, SEO-gamed content mills, and the
platforms’ own properties. The open web survives, but as a shadow of itself,
buried under a layer of corporate sludge. The promise of discovery has given
way to a kind of digital claustrophobia.
The deeper
cost of enshitification, however, is not technical—it is civic and
psychological. The internet that might have expanded our collective imagination
has instead narrowed it, filtering experience through metrics of virality and
monetization. It has eroded trust, blurred the line between fact and fiction,
and rewarded polarization over consensus. Worse, it has left us dependent on
systems we do not control. As ordinary users, we have little recourse when
platforms implode or pivot. Our digital lives—our communications, archives,
creative work—are hostage to the whims of executives and the imperatives of
quarterly earnings reports.
This was not
inevitable. Different choices in regulation, ownership, and design could have
fostered a more democratic digital sphere. But as with earlier moments in
America’s trajectory, profit was prioritized over stewardship. The internet was
not nurtured as a public good; it was strip-mined as a private asset. And so
the cycle repeated: early abundance followed by consolidation, enclosure, and
extraction.
By the
2020s, the pattern had become impossible to ignore. What once felt like
progress now felt like decay—an acceleration into diminishing returns. The
promise of the digital frontier had curdled into a system where everything
worked worse, cost more, and left its users more isolated, surveilled, and
exhausted.
The great
enshitification is not only a story about technology. It is a parable of late
capitalism itself: how systems built on the logic of endless growth inevitably
turn parasitic, consuming the very resources that gave them life. The missed
moment of the 1990s meant that by the time these dynamics were clear, the
infrastructure of daily life—from communication to commerce to
entertainment—was already entangled in systems designed for extraction.
In that
sense, enshitification is less an aberration than a symptom: a mirror
reflecting the deeper exhaustion of the American project.
The
Consequences for the Young
If the Great
Acceleration promised a future of rising tides, and the Neoliberal Turn
recalibrated that promise toward individual risk, the Great Enshitification has
made clear that the deck is stacked against most young people today. The
rewards of society’s labor and innovation, once broadly shared, are now
increasingly concentrated at the top. For the generations coming of age in the
2000s and 2010s, the American Dream is no longer a horizon toward which they
can steer—it is a mirage whose shape constantly shifts.
Economic
precarity defines much of their experience. Student debt has become a
millstone: the promise of higher education as a pathway to prosperity is now
undermined by loans that often exceed the starting salaries of graduates.
Housing, once attainable in a postwar boom fueled by unions and a growing
middle class, is now prohibitively expensive in cities where jobs cluster.
Renting consumes ever-larger portions of income, while homeownership feels out
of reach except for those who inherit wealth. Jobs themselves are unstable,
increasingly automated, and often offer no benefits, leaving young people
juggling gig work, temporary positions, and the perpetual fear of displacement
by technology.
Health and
well-being have also deteriorated. Obesity, diabetes, anxiety, depression, and
other chronic conditions reflect both lifestyle and systemic factors:
ultra-processed food, sedentary work, and an environment saturated with
stressors. Mental health crises have become normalized, yet support remains
inadequate. For many, the intersection of financial insecurity and societal
neglect cultivates a constant low-level anxiety, a sense that the future is
something to survive rather than shape.
Culturally,
the erosion of trust extends to institutions that once promised guidance and
protection. Politics feels distant, skewed by money, structural inequalities,
and procedural quirks—from the Electoral College to Senate
malapportionment—that amplify the voice of the few over the many. Young people
witness elections decided by the narrowest margins or by systemic quirks that
ignore the popular vote. Decisions about the environment, healthcare, and
social welfare are dominated by lobbying and campaign finance, leaving ordinary
citizens to absorb the consequences. The sense of agency, once foundational to
civic engagement, is undermined.
Social life,
too, bears the scars of historical choices. The dispersal of families in the
postwar suburban migration, combined with the dissolution of stable community
networks, has produced isolation. Loneliness is pervasive, compounded by
digital engagement that connects superficially while amplifying comparison,
envy, and disconnection. School shootings and mass violence reinforce the sense
of vulnerability and powerlessness, while the failure of policy interventions
signals that safety is contingent on wealth or luck rather than collective
protection.
All of this
shapes a worldview that is fundamentally different from that of the postwar
generation. Whereas the youth of the 1960s and 1970s believed in their capacity
to change the world, today’s young adults and teenagers are more likely to aim
for survival, stability, and incremental gains. Their horizon is constrained by
debt, climate anxiety, and the fallout of policy choices they did not make.
Dreaming big is difficult when the scaffolding of opportunity has been removed.
And yet,
even amid these challenges, the human capacity for adaptation persists.
Networks of activism, mutual aid, and technological savvy show that young
people are not entirely passive recipients of systemic failure. They are
learning to navigate, hack, and sometimes resist the structures that constrain
them. But the weight of history—of missed opportunities, neoliberal policy, and
societal erosion—presses down relentlessly, shaping a generation whose
expectations are measured not in the grandeur of achievement, but in the
mitigation of harm.
In short,
the consequences of the previous decades—the Postwar Dream deferred, the
acceleration unchecked, the neoliberal turn embraced, the missed moment
unheeded, and the enshitification realized—land disproportionately on those
least responsible for creating the system. The young inherit not a dream, but a
landscape defined by constraint, compromise, and crisis management.
The Age
of Flux
We live now
in an era that defies simple description: an Age of Flux in which the
foundations of society, economy, and environment are all in motion, often at
once. The forces unleashed by the Great Acceleration, the Neoliberal Turn, and
the ensuing enshitification have produced a world in which stability is no
longer the default, and certainty is a fragile illusion.
Economically,
globalization and technological transformation continue to reshape labor
markets at dizzying speed. Automation, artificial intelligence, and platform
economies are replacing and restructuring jobs, often faster than workers can
retrain. Financial systems are increasingly abstract, global, and
interdependent, with shocks propagating rapidly across continents. Economic
inequality, having widened for decades, is now a structural feature of society
rather than a temporary aberration.
Socially and
culturally, the consequences are profound. Trust in institutions—government,
media, education, and corporations—remains eroded. Digital platforms mediate
much of life, shaping perception and discourse while simultaneously enabling
both connection and manipulation. Climate change, resource scarcity, and
biodiversity loss present challenges that are both global and existential,
forcing humans to confront limits that were invisible to the postwar
generation. The youth of today inherit a world in which the future is
uncertain, fluid, and often threatening.
Yet within
flux lies possibility. The very systems that destabilize can also catalyze
adaptation and innovation. Movements for social justice, environmental
stewardship, and participatory governance demonstrate that citizens can reclaim
agency, even in constrained conditions. Digital tools, while imperfect and
often exploitative, also enable unprecedented communication, collaboration, and
mobilization. The challenge—and opportunity—of the Age of Flux is to navigate
complexity while retaining sight of shared purpose.
This age
calls for creative resilience: the capacity to imagine, experiment, and act in
ways that do not rely on the old scaffolding of stable growth, linear progress,
or inherited privilege. It asks us to recognize interdependence rather than
individual ascendancy, to cultivate systems that prioritize stewardship over
extraction, and to balance human aspiration with ecological and societal
limits.
In many
ways, the Age of Flux is a reckoning with history. It is the culmination of the
Postwar Dream’s promise, the Great Acceleration’s momentum, the neoliberal
recalibration of the social contract, the missed opportunities of the 1990s,
and the enshitification of digital and economic systems. It is the world shaped
by choices—collective, political, and technological—that were made over the
last seventy-five years.
But it is
also a world of agency. While the past cannot be rewritten, understanding the
threads that brought us here allows for deliberate intervention, for designing
societies, economies, and technologies that serve broad human and planetary
well-being. The Age of Flux is, paradoxically, both a warning and an
invitation: a warning that the status quo is fragile, and an invitation to
imagine, innovate, and act in ways that renew possibility rather than diminish
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments will be reviewed before posting. Civility is a must.