The key to this process, of course, is to make sure that the masses keep their hands off of their stash. To do this, it is absolutely essential that the redistribution of wealth be considered a mortal sin, and that it is more likely for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than it is for an individual who thinks that wealth distribution is a good idea to get elected to a national assembly.
Try as they may, progressives simply cannot garner enough votes to make a difference, especially when less and less people even bother to show up and vote.
Let's not be delusionally optimistic about this state of affairs in North America changing anytime soon.
The playing field is not level. The deck is overwhelmingly stacked to protect the status quo as a result of the electoral process. If you want to get elected, you need money, and people who have money to give don't give their money to support candidates who propose to restrict their capacity to make it.
So, for those who know about such things as the common good and the social gradient with regard to health outcomes, it's time to get out of the electoral process altogether.
The Athenians figured this out about 2500 years ago when they set up the world's first democracy. In order to prevent private interests from taking over, Athenians did not elect representatives. They represented themselves in the citizens assembly and the officers of the assembly were rotated on an annual basis on the basis of a lottery.
Centuries later, the French political philosopher, Jean Jacques Rousseau, argued in his brilliant work, The Social Contract, that it is crucial that all the people exercise their sovereignty by attending legislated assemblies, for whenever people stop doing so, or elect representatives to do so in their place, their sovereignty is lost.
If sovereignty is lost by electing representatives, how can it be regained?
Do like the Athenians. Refuse to elect representatives. In the Age of the Internet, we no longer need them.
We already have the technology. We can create a permanent assembly of citizens who meet and exchange their ideas and opinions and can vote for themselves on the issues that concern them directly in a virtual agora, free from the tyranny of private interests who more or less choose who will be the intermediaries that will distort the general will of the people in order to align it with their private gain.
A political party is nothing more than a corporation designed to transfer the sovereignty of the people to its executive body. Once this is done, it is relatively easy for a privileged elite to influence their decision making. This would not be the case if sovereignty remained in the hands of the people.
Put another way, a government of, by, and for the people only comes about when the people retain their sovereign right to vote directly on the matters that concern them. Once sovereignty is transferred away, government becomes of, by, and for the wealthy, at the expense of the people.
As a result, if social outcomes are to change for the better, people need to stop shopping for the best political party they can find and get down to work on building a permanent citizens assembly in their electoral district.